1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasons for the decision on non-approval of the additional injury and disease ① The plaintiff (B male) served as coal assistant at the Korea Coal Corporation's mining center from July 4, 1984 to December 7, 1989, and the Korea Coal Corporation from September 21, 1993 to May 15, 2014.

② On July 3, 2018, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff’s medical care by recognizing the “assumption of the parts in the vicinity of each field before the end of each field” which was diagnosed on December 1, 2017 by the Plaintiff as an occupational disease.

③ On October 18, 2018, when the Plaintiff was under medical care due to the above injury and disease, the Plaintiff appealed from the D Hospital located in the East Sea (hereinafter “the instant additional injury and disease”), and received a written diagnosis from the D Hospital located in the East Sea, and applied for medical care benefits for the instant additional injury and disease to the Defendant on November 1, 2018.

④ On December 13, 2018, after deliberation by the panel of advisory doctors, the Defendant’s blanks of the Defendant’s blanks, with respect to the Plaintiff on December 13, 2018, the status of the injury or disease is not more serious than the same age.

“A decision on non-approval of an additional injury or disease (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) was made on the ground that the decision was made.

⑤ The Plaintiff filed a petition for review against this and filed a petition. On June 24, 2019, the Defendant’s “The progress of the Plaintiff’s change in the state of his/her departure, which is observed in accordance with the Plaintiff’s trend and the RoI’s opinion, has been significantly deteriorated as a result of the work similar to the degree ordinarily observed in the same age group.”

As the opinion that can be seen is not confirmed, it is difficult to recognize the relationship between the business and the additional business branch of this case.

“The Plaintiff dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for review on the ground of the foregoing.

(6) The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination, but the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for reexamination on October 31, 2019.