A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:00 on September 13, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s assault case against Cheongju District Court No. 423, Cheongju District Court No. 423, Cheongju District Court No. 2012, 783, the same court in Cheongju-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu.

The Defendant testified to the left side on the wind that the Defendant would escape from the questioning of the Prosecutor “,” even though there is a fact that the Defendant has taken one time of the left shoulder of the witness by drinking.

At that time, the Defendant continued to testify to the prosecutor’s question “I see,” which is suitable for drinking, and testified to the prosecutor’s question “I see that the Defendant would be adequate for the Defendant to take a part of the witness’s shoulder once”.

In addition, the defendant testified as "for example" to the prosecutor's question, "I see that the defendant has taken one time to drink the witness's face, and that the witness is broken while avoiding the witness."

However, on June 12, 2012, the defendant had no fact of drinking from C in a tourist bus that passed the first quarter of the Hocheon-si Ho-si Ho-si Ho-si Ho-si Ho-si.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C, D, and E;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witnesses A, F, and D;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning C and D;

1. A copy of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of a copy of judgment;

1. Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 152 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is a crime that interferes with the proper exercise of judgment authority, which is a judicial action of the State, and the discovery of substantial truth, and the responsibility of the crime is not less than that of the defendant, and the defendant denies and reflects the crime.