Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are those who work in Seoul Matro and work in Fatro.

1. At around 17:00 on December 18, 2015, Defendant A appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as forging-gu Seoul Northern District Court No. 402, Dobong-gu Seoul Northern District Court No. 749, Seoul Northern District Court No. 4024, the above court 2014Kadan4224, 2015Kadan1521, and 2807, and then asked the prosecutor’s question “I see whether the seal of the witness affixed on the confirmation of use should be affixed,” and the prosecutor’s “I am not preparing the confirmation of use” prepared the confirmation of use, and the Defendant (F) asked the witness to affix his seal on the confirmation of borrowing because it would cause damage to the witness.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not affix his seal on the loan certificate held by F as above, and the seal affixed on the above loan certificate was not affixed to the Defendant’s seal.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and time, appeared as a witness of the same case and took an oath, and asked the Prosecutor’s question at the presiding judge prior to the trial of the above case to question “a summary stamped with the seal of the witness”, and answer the Prosecutor’s question “a summary to read the above loan confirmation and affix the seal of the witness”, and answer to the Prosecutor’s question “a summary to have affixed the seal even with the knowledge of the contents of the tea confirmation”.

However, in fact, the defendant did not affix his seal on the loan certificate, and the seal affixed on the above loan certificate was not affixed to the defendant's seal.