Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On November 2012, 201, the Defendant had no capacity or intent to find the victims’ children as F University faculty members, and the Defendant had the victim’s children as F University staff members on the following occasions: “B is the head of the F University, spring, B is the head of the F University, and F University shall be employed two times in spring, B is not the president of the F University, and the above employees shall not be the president of the F University, and the above employees shall try to employ several teachers and staff members by increasing the departments, and shall employ the victims’ children as the faculty members of the said University.” On November 24, 2012, the Defendant continuously deceiving the victims to believe the victims’ children to be true, and acquired 150,000 U.S. pigs from the victims to the president on November 24, 2012, and transferred them to the Defendant’s account under the name of F University on March 25, 2013, by taking over the Defendant’s total amount of KRW 400,500,00.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant (as of the fourth trial date);
1. Legal statement of witness E;
1. Entry of part of the defendant in the police interrogation protocol of the defendant and statements E;
1. Statement to E by the police;
1. A certificate of H, I, J, and E production;
1. According to the above evidence, the defendant did not notify the victim, who was anticipated to find employment by deceiving the head of the office outside cooperation office (five pages) in the F.I.D., the F.I.D. A name card, the F.K. bank account, and the current status of the medical care center's property [the defendant did not decide or specify the reason for employment of the staff at the time of receiving f.S. pigs or loans. However, the defendant did not notify the victim who was anticipated to find employment by deceiving the head of the outside cooperation office (five pages of investigation records) of the facts (62-1, 72 pages of investigation records) (68, 69 pages of investigation records). According to the above evidence, it is reasonable to view that the defendant was transferred to the president the above victim's deception by taking advantage of the situation of the victim's deception, and received 77 pages of the borrowed pigs (proc. 73,74 pages of investigation records) or the above borrowed money (proc.