beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On July 20, 2010, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on July 20, 201 and released on October 28, 201, and the remaining term of imprisonment has expired on January 18, 2012.
Defendant
B On June 15, 2007, in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court, sentenced five years of imprisonment for the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims (special robbery, rape, etc.) and completed the execution of the above sentence on March 29, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
On December 2012, the Defendants posted an article to sell goods on the Internet site, and attempted to commit the Internet fraud by receiving the proceeds of goods from the victims who reported and contacted with the article. Defendant A conspired to serve as an Internet sales bulletin, contact with victims, and Defendant B to provide a passbook to receive remittance of the proceeds of goods.
1. From the FPC bank located in Daegu City around January 17, 2013, the Defendants posted an article to NAB Blouseet to NAB Blouseet, and the Defendant’s false statement to the effect that if the victim H deposits the purchase price in the Plouseet, he would send the Plouseet. However, the Defendants did not have any intent or ability to display the Plouse, even if he/she receives the Tlouse price.
Nevertheless, the Defendants, as seen above, were false and transferred KRW 2,40,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative (I) account in the name of Defendant B around 15:21 on the same day from the above H.
2. On January 16, 2013, the Defendants posted a false letter to the Internet NAVF Kafashion Sheet J (“11-year YF Hafap option test straw,” and on January 17, 2013, the Defendants reported the above notice and contacted the victim K that expressed the purchaser’s intent to deposit KRW 17.4 million with the passenger car price. However, the Defendants were to bring the car price from the victim.