logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2015.01.21 2013가합1887
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 238,515,786 and its related amount are 5% per annum from October 21, 2014 to January 21, 2015, and 5% per annum.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

A is a person who has undergone an operation, such as the invertebrate dye in the upper and upper part of the hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”), and the Plaintiff B and C are the parents of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is a doctor who has performed the above operation to the Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

A was diagnosed on February 27, 2012 to treat congenital vertebrates when they were aged 1 after birth, and was diagnosed on February 27, 2012 as “the congenital vertebrates only after the congenital vertebrate, accompanied by No. 1 in the congenital Modern Modern Modern Modern.”

Plaintiff

A around 08:40 on December 11, 2012, around 08:0, from the Defendant, “the first operation of this case” (hereinafter “the first operation”). A under the Defendant’s examination of the above Plaintiff’s condition on the same day, the Defendant started to perform a treatment to administer ice dye in a large quantity, and conducted a treatment to reduce the degree of crye and crye treatment (hereinafter “the second operation”) to the Plaintiff at around 17:50 on the same day. According to the degree of the second operation of this case, “the first operation to reduce the degree of crye and crye correction (hereinafter “the second operation”). The first operation to reduce the degree of crye and crye correction (hereinafter “the second operation”). According to the degree of crye and crye correction (the second operation) of the second operation to the Plaintiff at around 17:50 on the same day, the Defendant re-recorded the first operation to the Plaintiff.

The malfunction and condition of the above plaintiff's right-hand bridge continued after the second operation of this case.

Plaintiff

A discharged the Defendant Hospital on January 22, 2013, and the Director E of the Defendant Hospital prepared a letter (Evidence 16 of A) stating that “A will pay all of the medical expenses incurred in receiving treatment in the future from the F-Rehabilitation Medical Hospital” on the same day.

arrow