logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2019.08.28 2019고단680
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 8, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the Changwon District Court's Jinju branch on May 9, 2012, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. at the same court on May 9, 2012, and was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on August 26, 2015, and was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same support on December 19, 2017 and completed the execution of the final sentence in the Changwon Prison on November 1, 2018.

around 18:42 on April 20, 2019, the Defendant driven a D Sti-type car with approximately 10 meters away from the C Elementary School located in Jinju-si B to the vicinity of C Elementary School, and with approximately 0.180% alcohol concentration in blood.

As a result, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

"2019 Highest 876"

1. On June 14, 2019, the Defendant was driving a dice-type car in the section of about 1km from the F in F located in G E in G to the H adjacent road in G, while under the influence of alcohol at least 0.276% of the blood alcohol concentration, without obtaining a driver’s license on June 21, 2019.

As a result, the Defendant driven the car without a driver's license, and at the same time, violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, but once again driven the car under the influence of alcohol.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the car in the above D SP which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place under Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 680"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. On-site photographs, on-site images, and on-site statements of the driver;

arrow