logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.04.29 2014고단786
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 786"

1. Around 07:40 on April 20, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of a driver’s license on the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Defendant driven BSMM-BBB drive a vehicle at the 1km section of the road located in the south-gu Busan National University with a level of blood alcohol level of 0.064% in front of the presidential intersection located in the same Dong located in the south-gu Busan National University.

2. They shall not operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated BSP car which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

"2014 Highest 1010"

1. On May 31, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Busan District Court on May 31, 2013, and was prosecuted on May 19, 2014 by Busan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in Busan District Court’s branch, and is currently under trial.

On May 14, 2014, the Defendant, without a driver’s license around 23:30 on May 14, 2014, driven BSP drive a motor vehicle at approximately KRW 1km from the front of the center located in the Siri-gu, Busan, through the influence of alcohol level of 0.096%.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the regulations on prohibition of drunk driving at least twice, driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol without a driver's license.

2. They shall not operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated BSP car which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of each host driver;

1.Each.

arrow