logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.23 2017고단6906
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The facts charged are modified to the extent that the basic identity of the facts charged with obstruction of business is recognized.

At around 02:01 on April 29, 201, the Defendant reported to the police during the dispute, on the ground that, at the front of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, E, a driver of a taxi for D business, demanded the above-mentioned guest B, who was aboard the said taxi, to leave the destination without giving additional fees.

Accordingly, as the police at around 02:11 arrives, E, who made a report, rather, took the destination of the match at the same time, and B consented thereto.

In addition, after several minutes, E and B agreed not to have a destination, and B lowered.

In the written indictment, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant is able to take a bath for the victim, prevents the taxi from proceeding in front of the said taxi, and prevents the taxi from proceeding.” However, if the images of the taxi boom video CD were to be taken, the Defendant committed such an act before the misunderstanding by the police.

Since it is not visible, it is deleted from the form of act.

However, although the Defendant and B received a request from Gman who belongs to the F police box of Seoul Police Station in order to return home after being informed of the response procedure against the refusal to take a taxi, the Defendant and B prevented the above taxi from holding a taxi in order to stop in front of the above taxi, and demanded E to take a vehicle back to the police station without obtaining permission from E.

As such, the Defendant conspired with B to interfere with the taxi business of E by force.

2. On April 29, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the places indicated in paragraph 1 around April 02:12, 2017, pursuant to the above report of the Defendant, the Defendant complained against the Defendant that Ha was not taking the Defendant’s horse, G Ha was not taking the Defendant’s horse. G Hak’s arms were tightly pushed back with Hak’s two arms with Hak’s hand, and Hak’s chest part was pushed back with Hak’s finger hand.

(a) continue to exist;

arrow