logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.12.03 2015고단1388 (1)
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with C, D, E, F, etc., installed a game machine that was not rated by the Game Rating Board, installed the game machine in Pyeongtaek-si, and solicited customers to conduct the business of a private game room in cash when they accumulated the score obtained through the game in the card. C, the role of overall management of the establishment and management of the store, distribution of profits, etc., E, the role of overall management of the profit distribution of the individual game room, the role of the Defendant in exchanging the score obtained through the game, the role of the Defendant in exchanging the score of the individual game room, the F, the management of the individual game room, and D, the role of installing and managing the game machine in the individual game room, respectively.

The defendant, together with C, D, E, F, etc., has the same year beginning on January 2015, 201.

2. From October to October, 200, in the “H Gameland” game site located in Pyeongtaek-si G, 44 game machine for “a white light” without being rated by the Game Rating Board was established, and the game was operated in such a way as to enter 10% of the serial numbers on “game voucher” in the game machine after receiving cash from many unspecified customers who found the place, and then get them to play the game, and then get them to use it again in the same game room or to exchange it through the Defendant, and deliver it to customers by reserving it in the “I card”, a bearer securities issued at the same place.

Accordingly, in collusion with C, D, E, F, etc., the Defendant provided game products not rated by the Game Rating Board, caused customers who found the game site to do gambling and other speculative acts using game products, and exchanged tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of game products as business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning C and D;

1. J.

arrow