logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.12.21 2017구합50083
기타(일반행정)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established on August 20, 201 with real estate leasing business, manufacturing of temporary facilities, etc. as its business purpose, and the Defendant is a corporation established under the Korea Rail Network Authority Act for the construction and management of railroad facilities and the efficient implementation of other projects related thereto.

B. On March 2014, the Defendant: (a) granted the Plaintiff permission to use each parcel of land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”); (b) the following conditions of permission (hereinafter “instant conditions of permission”) were attached to the Plaintiff for consideration for State property attached thereto (hereinafter “instant permission to use”).

Article 1 (Purpose of Use) The purpose of use shall be an office and a sales store.

Article 2 (Period of Use) The period of use shall be from June 1, 201 to August 9, 2016.

In any of the following cases, permission for use may be revoked for all or part of the permitted property:

1. Where the State or a local government directly requires it for official or public use;

2. If he/she obtains the said permission by false statements, presentation of defective documentary evidence, or other unlawful means;

3. Where he/she allows any third party to use the permitted property or make profits therefrom, in violation of Article 30 (2) of the State Property Act;

4. If he/she neglects the preservation of the said property or violates the purpose of its use;

5. Where he/she fails to pay user fees by the payment deadline, or fails to take measures for depositing a security deposit or performance guarantee under the latter part of Article 32 (2) of the State Property

6. Where the original state of property for which permission for use has been granted without the approval of the defendant is changed, when the period for permission for use expires or when the property for use is returned following the revocation of permission for use, it shall be returned in its original state in the participation of the personnel of

Article 15 (Applications for Renewal of Permits for Use) The period for use expires.

arrow