logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2017.07.07 2017가단3680
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From January 1, 2017, the above-mentioned A

subsection (b).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 22, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the lease of the building listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant housing”) with the deposit of KRW 1,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 230,000, and the rent of KRW 1,000, monthly rent of KRW 230,000, and the rent of KRW 1,000,000 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

B. Around October 1, 2016, the Defendant received the instant house from the Plaintiff and resided in this case until now, and did not pay it as the monthly rent from January 1, 2017.

C. A copy of the complaint of this case stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to cancel the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the Defendant’s delinquency in rent was served on the Defendant on April 3, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant house to the Plaintiff, barring special circumstances, and to pay the Plaintiff the agreed rent and unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent and rent, calculated at the rate of KRW 230,000 per month from January 1, 2017 to the delivery date of the instant house.

3. As to the judgment of the defendant's assertion, the defendant asserted that the defendant paid the plaintiff the rent of January 201 to the plaintiff, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

4. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.

arrow