beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, and the defendants E, and F shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution for violating the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on March 31, 2020
4. 8. The judgment became final and conclusive.
【Criminal Facts】
Defendant
B is the representative of the K in-si, Kimpo-si, the representative of the K in-si, the representative of K, the president of L, the representative of L, the president of N, the president of N, the representative of the P church, the director of the P church, etc. The defendant Eul is the representative of the K in-si, Kimpo-si, the representative of the K in-si, the defendant Eul is the representative of the K in-si, the representative of the K in-si, the head of N, the representative of the N in-O, and the director of the P church. The defendant Eul is the representative of the L in-gu, Incheon. The defendant Eul is the representative of the L in-gu, Incheon, a person who works as a motor vehicle for a free-use vehicle from the K in-gu, and the defendant Eul is the person who is employed for the daily work.
No one shall invite a foreigner to enter the Republic of Korea by improper means, such as a false statement of fact or a false fidelity guarantee, or arrange such invitation.
1. In the case of Defendant B and Defendant C’s joint criminal conduct with S in Vietnam, S operating “T” was proposed to offer to Defendant C, who performs interpretation work in Korea, KRW 200,000 won per case of recruitment of companies that would give false invitation of foreigners of Vietnam’s nationality. Defendant C offered to the company giving false invitation that “50-700,000 won per case will be given to the company giving false invitation.” Defendant C offered to Defendant B, who became aware of the previous company employees of the company that had been employed, “I would make a invitation for entry by foreigners, and will give KRW 70,000 won per case per entry.” Defendant B consented to the invitation of foreigners in the name of L in order to give false invitation in the name of L in accordance with the terms of payment for consideration.
S around November 2017, a copy of U-Korean passport, data for invitation purpose of foreigners of Vietnam who wish to enter the Republic of Korea.