Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, the period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is between the two parties to the instant case and D, and Defendant B is the friendship of Defendant A.

The above D, while drinking alcohol at the main points near the E Station with Defendant A and Defendant B, went out of the main points in order to smoke, and the other F and the shoulder of this case were faced with time.

1. On July 31, 2016, at around 03:20 on July 31, 2016, Defendant A heard the words “H main points” located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, “H,” and found D. The case of collective assault was committed by Defendant A, upon receiving a report from 112, the Defendant sent to the police officer of the Seocho-gu, Seocho Police Station I Police Station, who was called out after receiving a 112 report, reported that he would take D in the patrol vehicle, and reported that the police officer assigned to the police officer of the Seocho-gu, who was called out after receiving the 112 report that the case was committed, carried the body of the said J in good faith, and prevented the Defendant from committing the Defendant’s act, and “h, h, and h, shall be discarded to the chief of the police box of the Seocho Police Station, who belongs to

“In doing so, the face of K was assaulted, i.e., once a week, with her face, by her hand, and her hair, by her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

2. Defendant B, at the time and time as described in the above paragraph 1, sent out of the main point that he would not go back to the her mother-child D fighting. Defendant B, upon receiving a report from 112 that a group assault case occurred, instructed the police box of the Seocho Police Station I box affiliated with the police box of the Seocho Police Station I box sent out to the site to arrest Defendant B, who is a her mother, as a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties for the reason as described in paragraph 1 of the above paragraph, and assaulted Defendant B by breaking the body of the above L on his hand and breaking it over the sealed floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the 112 report processing by police officers and legitimate execution of duties related to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F or D;

1. K’s statement protocol (including L’s statement) 1.