logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.02.09 2017고정319
폐기물관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the actual operator of the C Co., Ltd. as the auditor of the C Co., Ltd. located in the Chungcheongnambuk-gun, and C Co., Ltd. is a corporation established to produce valves, etc. due to main work.

Any person discharging wastes from his/her place of business shall treat wastes generated from his/her place of business directly or by entrustment to a person who has obtained permission for his/her waste treatment business, a reporter of waste treatment, or

Nevertheless, at around November 29, 201, the Defendant: (a) in C Co., Ltd. located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (b) in fact, inasmuch as it is a chemical shop located in the gas type of gas using CO2, the waste gas plant discharged from C (State) and the chemical shop located in C Co., Ltd.; (c) was permitted to dispose of the waste gas station due to the fact that it can be disposed of only the waste gas station; (d) although waste collection and transportation business entity was not treated by C, it was allowed to transport 24,200km of the waste gas station located in the former North Hasan-gun, the Defendant disposed of it through (f)D by means of reclaiming it.

From that time until January 14, 2015, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, processed them into approximately 2,370,340 g of a total sum of 102 times, without obtaining permission to dispose of the master chemical substance located in the chemical shop in the same manner (such as the list of crimes).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A report on investigation (report on the progress of collection of samples of waste samples from C and a report on the confirmation of the nature of the waste main agent);

1. Each test report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a contract for entrusted disposal of wastes, a written report on recycling wastes, and a certificate of entrusted disposal capacity;

1. In full view of the facts constituting an offense, Articles 65 subparag. 2 and 18(1) of the former Waste Management Act (amended by Act No. 13038, Jan. 20, 2015); the selection of fines (the total volume of waste main agents that have been disposed of in violation of the Waste Management Act reaches 2,300 tons; and the process of soil contamination test exceeds 4.8 times the standard value of forest areas.

arrow