beta
Text
1. Of the ruling rendered on January 16, 2013, the part against the Plaintiffs in the Daejeon District Court Decision 2008 Book1.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The history of the accident 1) During the main tugboat C and auxiliary tugboat D towing the barge E and sailing to the Samsung Heavy Industries Shipbuilding located at the port of Incheon, E’s towing line is cut. On December 7, 2007, at the 6-day sea (N 36-52.1, N 126-03.1, N 126-03.1) southwest-west, west-west, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-gun, west-do, west-do, west-do, 126-5.1) collision with the oil tanker F who anchored at the port and loaded approximately three holes in the port of the oil tanker, and
(2) The instant accident occurred. (2) The raw milk leaked out of the instant accident began into the westwest and into the shore, and came into contact with the coast of the west-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun. During its draft, it rapidly spreads to the coast extending a total of 70 km away from the coast of the west-gun, Taean-gun, Taean-gun, to the coast of the west-gun, Taewon-gun, Taean-gun, the west-gun, the west-gun, the west-gun, the west-gun, the west-gun, and the west-gun, some coast of the west-
As raw milk not abutting on the coast moves from sea to tar, it reached the 9th day, the 11th day, the 11th day, the 31th day, the 1st day, the 1st day, the 31th day, the 1st day, and the 31th day, the 1st day, the 1st day, the
B. The Plaintiffs were abolished and established at Jin-do, Chungcheongnam-do pursuant to the Act on the Establishment, etc. of Si in the urban and rural complex form, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, which was enacted by Act No. 10993, August 4, 2011, and enforced as of January 1, 2012. The Plaintiffs were reported fisheries and permitted fisheries (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant fisheries”) as indicated in the “report number” and “permission number” column in the attached list.
(2) Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”) is the owner of F, and Defendant A’s International Fund for Oil Pollution Damage Compensation in 192 (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant International Fund”) is the owner of the oil pollution damage in 192.