A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 05:30 on July 25, 2015, the Defendant was forced to move voluntarily to the zone Down Police Station at the Hansan National Police Station D District District E, and, while returning home to another patrol vehicle operated by the horse E at the Hansan National Police Station D District E, the Defendant continued to use anti-end and bath language, such as “F, I special?, I special?, I special, I special, I special, I special, I special, I special, am special, I special, am special.” “I special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special.” “I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, I am special, and I am special, I do not am special.”

The Defendant continued to commit the foregoing act, which led to a series of districts located in the Yongsan-gu U.S. military police station located in Yongsan-gu I, and committed assault by the Defendant, stating that “Arreshing is done when I return to the same,” to the circumstances andJ of the said zone, “Arrehhh when I return to the same, I would be able to do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning investigation duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement to E and J;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes under relevant Articles of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (the time and place of crimes within the patrol car and the crimes in the D District shall be the same as the time, method and method of crimes, and the victim shall be different);

1. The reason and degree of the crime of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is significant in light of the characteristics of the instant crime.

However, the fact that each of the crimes of this case does not seem to be a planned crime is divided by the defendant, the defendant has deposited part of the damage for the victims of the weak, and the execution is suspended only once by considering the gender, age, and past history of the defendant.

more.