Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

B A business owner who operated sexual traffic establishments with the trade name "D" on the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the first floor, and the defendant is a manager of the above sexual traffic establishments, who works for the above sexual traffic establishments.

The Defendant, in collusion with B, in operating the said sexual traffic business place, intended to arrange sexual traffic by having male customers and E receive 80,000 won for sexual traffic (30,000 won for 30,000 won for 50,000 won for 120,000 won for 120,000 won for 50,000 won for 50,000 won for 70,000 won for ever, and agreed with the female employees E to distribute to the female employees as 70,000 won for ever, by reporting Internet “F”, “G”, “H”, and “H” sites, etc., and by having male customers and E receive sexual intercourse.

The Defendant and B received 80,000 won in cash from unspecified male customers on three occasions at the above sexual traffic business establishment from October 4, 2016 to October 6, 2016, and received 80,000 won in cash from the above E and male customers, thereby allowing male customers to have sexual intercourse with each other.

As a result, the defendant conspired with B to engage in commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B or E by the police;

1. A written statement of I;

1. A real estate lease agreement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing Internet advertising pictures;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (comprehensively, selection

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not highly harmful to society by commercializing women's sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, and that the defendant attempted to avoid B's punishment by stating himself/herself as his/her business owner on behalf of B after the police control.

On the other hand, the defendant.