The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors) was cited by the Defendant as a slurber in E E, but the bus stops, which was the same that the Defendant was trying to h from the bus stops, with the intention of committing a theft. As such, the Defendant was merely slurbling the slurb to the slurburg on the trial decision, and did not have any criminal intent to commit a theft.

2. The court below duly adopted and examined the evidence and the statement made by F in the court below, namely, F, at the time of the instant Mt to the entrance of the investigative agency and the court of the first instance, made telephone conversations with the entrance of the store at the time. The defendant showed that the defendant was slicker on the two uniforms where the two slicker used the sloter to open the sloter on the two slicker, and consistently stated that he observed the bus stop and the bus stop. According to CCTV images installed in the instant Mt, at the time of the instant Mt, the defendant was slicker and slicker on his hand, and the two slicker did not inform the employees of the fact that the two slicker had slicker on the wall of the fact that it was difficult to accept the fact that the defendant had not been slicked on the wall of this case without notifying the employees of the fact that he had been slicker on the wall of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the defendant.