A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2004, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months of imprisonment for larceny at the Busan District Court on November 1, 2004, and on November 9, 2004, the defendant was more than nine times of the same military force, and habitually;

1. On December 14, 2005, around 12:01 on December 14, 2005, the victim E and the employee F, the vice head of the above D, who were the victim E and the employees of the above D, were to purchase the monitors of the BD computer within the store, and one paper bag containing 910,000 won in cash owned by the victim from the inside money of the victim, which was placed before the display stand of the above BD computer in a creb of the victim's monitoring negligence in order to locate the victim's goods.

(v) theft;

2. Around April 15, 2006, around 12:48, 2006, in the first store for the operation of the H located in G, using the gaps in which surveillance was neglected, the sum of the market value of Samsung Nowon-gu computer 2, which is located in the display stand, was 3,980,000 won in the two uniforms, and then cut back to the two uniforms where the sum of the market value was 3,980,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, and H;

1. Reports on damage, estimates, and CCTV photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Investigative inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (the attachment of the text of the judgment and reporting of the results of confirmation of the previous convictions of the disposition);

1. Habituality: The defendant repeatedly commits the same crime within a short period, and the same is the same as theft of cash or electronic equipment in creshion of the method of crime and the supervision over employees engaged in the crime.

In this context, the defendant's criminal records, the number of crimes, the period of crimes, etc. can be recognized.

[Defendant and defense counsel had a relationship between the criminal facts No. 1 and the criminal facts of the judgment of the Jeonju District Court 2006 High Court 15 February 15, 2006 and the criminal facts of the judgment of the High Court 2006

However, in the above judgment, the defendant is punished as a crime of habitual larceny or of larceny (thief) in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.