logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고단3057
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 절도 피고인은 2016. 5. 24. 00:35경 피해자 B가 운영하는 서울 마포구 C에 있는 D 편의점 내에서 진열대 놓여 있는 3,500원 상당의 맛밤 1개를 집어 들어 포장지를 뜯어서 들고 있던 커피 컵에 넣어서 들고 가 절취하였다.

2. 폭행 피고인은 위 1항과 같은 일시 장소에서 피해자가 계산을 하지 않고 밖으로 나가는 것을 보고 따라가 허리춤을 잡고 안으로 끌고 들어오자 잡고 있던 피해자의 손을 뿌리치면서 ‘내가 뭘 잘못 했냐’며 큰소리 치고, 오른손에 들고 있던 양복 상의로 위 편의점 계산대를 1회 내리치고, 계속해서 피해자를 향해 그 양복 상의로 2회에 걸쳐 때릴 듯 한 태도를 보여 폭행을 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (CCTV image verification report);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of a fine for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. We should consider all the factors of sentencing, including the confession and reflect of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the background leading to the instant crime, the circumstance leading up to the single-time fine, and other factors of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder while under the influence of alcohol.

According to the records, although the defendant could be recognized that he was drinking at the time of the crime of this case, in light of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the means and method of the crime, and the defendant's speech and behavior before and after the crime of this case, the defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case

(b).

arrow