The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim by cutting down both arms of the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, the victim, who consistently from the investigation stage to the court of the lower court, left the Defendant to return money (investment money) to both his/her own arms, and the key business operator subsequently testified to the effect that he/she arrived at the site, and D also waited for the key business operator from the investigation agency to the court of the lower court.

B. In addition, the defendant made a statement to the effect that the key company arrived at the scene after the defendant was pushedping and pushed down the two arms of the victim, and that the key company arrived at the scene. In full view of the fact that there are no extenuating circumstances to suspect the credibility of each of the above statements made by the victim and D, the victim made a statement by the police to the effect that "the victim had a hole in double arms, string, hack, hackh" was used as an assault by the defendant, and the injury diagnosis letter against the victim stated that the victim suffered an injury, such as the victim's two-time medical treatment, hacks, hacks, hacks, hacks, and tensions, etc., the victim's two arms as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below, and it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant suffered an injury requiring about two weeks medical treatment. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

Defendant

E, a witness in the court of the court below, was almost as the defendant on the day of the instant case, but it was not possible to find out at all whether the victim had been a victim because he did not open the office door.

However, the defendant is the defendant.