A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:30 on June 11, 2015, the Defendant found in the Jeju-si Police Station D District Unit of the Jeju-si Police Station D District, and took a bath throughout several times without any particular reason in the state of under the influence of alcohol, and the police officer under the jurisdiction of the Defendant recommended the Defendant to return home, the Defendant, who was a police officer under the jurisdiction of the Defendant, was sleeping back the flick E’s flick slope flick, and continued to read inside and outside the above flick E’s flick for about 1 hour, and “I do not have any mobile phone. There is no money, so that I do not have any mobile phone inside and outside the said flick,” and expressed his flick E “a mobile phone tax base as a mobile phone tax base.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the police officer who is performing legitimate official duties on the protection of the host and on the earth's duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by police to E (victims);

1. Investigation report (on-site CCTV verification);

1. Service log for victimized police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by the earth's aftermath of the earth, and photographs analyzing visual images of the earth's CCTV;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The act of obstructing the execution of official duties by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing below) is an unfavorable condition to the defendant, and the fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and objects to it, and that there is no previous conviction within the last ten years is a favorable condition to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.