Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On June 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the real estate office located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul) around June 16, 2015, the real estate broker E without authority for the purpose of exercising the real estate as if the Defendant’s husband obtained D’s consent; and (b) without authority for the purpose of having the real estate broker E enter the real estate in the column for the location of the site for the real estate lease agreement; (c) “85,” “one hundred million in the space for the deposit column; (d) the lessor deliver the said real estate to the lessee by July 15, 2015; and (e) the lease period from the delivery date to June 15, 2016; and (e) the lessor’s column stated “F, G, H, and D” in the name adjacent to D.

D’s seal, affixed it to I who is aware of this fact.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a copy of a private document on the rights and obligations written in the name of “D,” and exercised a copy of a forged real estate lease agreement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Evidential materials among written complaint;

2. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on real estate lease agreements;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 231 (the point of Article 231), 234, and 231 (the point of uttering of the aforementioned investigation document) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines (the fact that the defendant is against his/her gender, the circumstances leading up to the forgery of the lease contract, and the first fact that the contract is forged, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the office of the victim I located in Seoul J on June 2015, the Defendant: (a) deducted the victim from the victim I’s funds for the purpose of using the funds managed by the veterans’ office; and (b) if the Defendant entered into a contract for non-libing and confidentiality services through the lawsuit at the International Air and Air Conference, the amount of the funds

There are many money.

10 million won.