1. The Defendant: 4,00,000 won to Plaintiff A; 2,340,000 won to Plaintiff B and C; and 1,820,000 won to Plaintiff D and G; and the Plaintiff.

The plaintiffs seek the payment of overdue wages, and the defendant asserts that the plaintiffs are not the workers employed by the defendant, but the overdue wages are different from the plaintiff's assertion.

In light of the overall purport of pleadings, the facts acknowledged in the final judgment on other civil and criminal cases related thereto, etc. in the civil trial, barring any special circumstance, are flexible evidence. In light of the overall purport of pleadings, the defendant, around May 2012, ordered K to employ workers and manage labor necessary for the instant construction work, and ordered K to take charge of the job site manager, as well as ② on June 1, 2012, the defendant subcontracted the landscaping part of the instant construction work to K Cheong-do Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Cheong-do Construction”), and ③ the defendant’s on-site director K employed the landscaping work as a daily allowance and carried out the landscaping work, ④ the plaintiffs’ work period and overdue wages stated in the attached Table, ⑤ the defendant’s claim against K 200,000 won to be subject to criminal punishment as a fine for violation of the Labor Standards Act (hereinafter referred to as “instant Act”).

If so, all of the plaintiffs' claims are reasonable, it is decided as per Disposition by admitting them.