1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. On April 24, 2015, the Plaintiffs: (a) the Plaintiff, who is a father between Plaintiff B and Plaintiff C, was sexually indecent act by having the fluoral father of the Plaintiff A who was under the supervision of the Defendant’s kindergarten construction work; (b) on May 30, 2015, the Plaintiff was sexually sexually indecent act against the indecent person who appears to be an employee of the E kindergarten at the same place; and (c) due to such sexually indecent act, the Plaintiffs suffered emotional distress, and thus, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiffs of the amount stated in the purport of the claim as solatium.

The written evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, 4, and 6 alone is insufficient to acknowledge that Plaintiff A was subject to indecent act as alleged by the Plaintiffs, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. Thus, the Plaintiffs’ assertion and claim premised on this premise are without merit.

2. The plaintiffs' claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.