1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, the defendant shall not exceed 12,801, 478 won to the plaintiff, and 7,524.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs were employed by the “E” of the D Operation, and Plaintiff A provided their labor from July 23, 200 to August 4, 2016, and Plaintiff B from June 1, 2015 to August 4, 2016.

B. The wages in arrears of Plaintiff A are 12,801,478 won (wages 3,387,097 won, retirement pay 8,414,381 won, bonuses 1,00,000 won), and the wages in arrears of Plaintiff B are 7,524,638 won (wages 3,387,097 won, retirement pay 3,137,541 won, bonuses 1,00,000 won).

C. On August 4, 2016, D deceased on August 4, 2016, the Defendant (Seoul Family Court 2016 saw 9463), who is the spouse, succeeded solely to each renunciation of inheritance (the Seoul Family Court 2016 saw 9463). The Defendant made a qualified acceptance (the Seoul Family Court 2016 saw 9462).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-2, Gap evidence 2-1-5, Eul evidence 1, Eul 2-3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff A 12,801,478 won, the Plaintiff B 7,524,638 won, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from August 19, 2016 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the 14th day after the retirement date, within the scope of property inherited from the network D.

3. In conclusion, each of the plaintiffs' claims is justified within the above scope of recognition, and it is so decided as per Disposition.