A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business at the Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Busan District Court’s Branch on December 11, 2014.

Around 23:20 on December 1, 2014, the Defendant reported a civil petition that “the Defendant spits, spits, takes spits, and takes a bath on the taxi in the taxi,” which was immediately demanded the police officer E to leave the taxi to make a statement on the circumstances of the instant case.

The Defendant committed assault against police officers E, such as “a fluor, fluor, fluor, bitch fluor,” and fluor, “a fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor,” and fluoring the fluore part of E at one time by fluor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of police officers' crimes and the handling of civil petition affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry records, and application of three-minutes of judgment;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (All circumstances, such as the confession of a criminal act and the violation thereof, and the fact that a judgment in the judgment became final and conclusive could have been punished together with the crime);

1. Probation and order to provide community service and attend lectures, and Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;