A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Larceny on May 16, 2014;

A. At around 17:30 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant thefted the victim C’s “E” point of the victim’s C operation located in Chuncheon City, Sincheon-si, with a gap in the victim’s surveillance neglected, the Defendant stolen a total of KRW 128,00,00,000 at the market price, with one set of KRW 49,00,000, the victim’s market price, which was displayed at the entrance of the store by using the gap in the victim’s surveillance neglected.

B. From May 16, 2014, around 17:40 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant thefted the victim F’s “G clothes” store operated by the victim F, which was located in Chuncheon City D, with the victim’s negligence of surveillance, the victim’s market at the entrance of the store was cut off with one set of female-use capital equivalent to KRW 9,000 at the market price, which is the victim’s possession, located at the entrance of the store.

2. On October 13, 2014, around 15:50 on October 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the “J clothes point” point in the operation of the victim I located in Chuncheon-si H on October 13, 2014; (b) used a gap in the victim’s surveillance neglect to put one punishment equivalent to KRW 7,00 of the market price, which is the victim’s possession, in the front of the said clothing store; and (c) cut off.

As a result, the Defendant stolen the four clothes equivalent to the total market price of 234,000 won through three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement C, F, and I;

1. Each receipt; and

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on video recording pictures ofCC-TV;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution ( normal consideration, such as the fact that the amount of damage is relatively small, the defendant has compensated most of the damage, the victims have not been punished against the defendant, and the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the fine);