(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.11.02 2017나184 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.11.02 2017나184

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claims extended by this court, shall be modified as follows, paragraph 2.

2.(a)

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for amendments to the text of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is cited by the main sentence of

Part 3, “This Court” in Part 19 is written by the court of first instance “C,” the witness G of the first instance court “B”.

Part 5, "Expert H" in Part 16 was put into practice with "Expert H of the First Instance and the High Instance H (hereinafter "Expert H"). Parts 6 through 9 were put into practice as follows. The entrance of each building of this case, which is the building listed in the attached Table 1 List 3, is not "C-45 Vs" products of this case (it is used for the wall and roof of each building of this case) but "C-45 Vs," the wall and roof of the defendant's production, and other panel products of the defendant's production (the interior heat is a general stikes, and the rainwater is located in the upper part of the entrance); (ii) the building was manufactured with the product of another company (the body of the second instance judgment, located in the upper part of the entrance); (iii) the building of this case, which is the building of this case listed in the attached Table 1 list, was manufactured with the original entrance of the second instance judgment; but the building of this case was not attached with the drawings of the first instance judgment by 17.

In light of the circumstances where corrosion occurred at approximately 270 meters away from the original breeding 17th building (No. 17th building) and the warehouse located at a place less than 270 meters away from the original breeding fish (No. 18th building of Appendix 2, even in the building of this case established in each of the above buildings, the corrosion occurred at the lower part of 65 meters away from the lower part of the trademark of this case, the corrosion phenomenon of the trademark of this case was derived from the special environment where the corrosion

(b) take into account such special circumstances.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2015.07.23 2014누65341

-광주고등법원 2015.06.26 2014나375

-서울행정법원 2014.09.26 2014구단51961

-대전고등법원 2018.02.07 2017나14749

-대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.02.17 2014가합1907