1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. (1) On March 24, 200, the Plaintiff purchased the (i) B, 548 square meters (hereinafter “land”) and the third-story building (the total floor area on the building ledger = 914.85 square meters) of a 1st floor factory: 343.24 square meters of 340.24 square meters of 340.24 square meters of a 341.41 square meters of a 340.41 square meters of a 340.41 square meters of a 1st floor; hereinafter “respond building”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 12, 200. B, on July 4, 2007, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 4, 200, C, 4, 139 square meters (hereinafter “B”) and D, 139 square meters of land (hereinafter “III land”) and 340 square meters of a building building under the 5th floor registry.

B. (1), (2), (3), and (4) land is connected in order, and (3) At present, the No.448 is a single building with a building area of approximately five hundred square meters.

(②③④토지상에 건축물대장에 부합하지 않는 이와 같은 단일건물이 축조된 경위 및 그것이 무단증축인지 여부는 서울행정법원 2013구합63247호 사건에서 다투어지고 있으며, 이 사건 처분사유와는 무관하므로 더 나아가 판단하지 아니한다. 이하에서는 현존하는 단일건물을 ‘㉯건물’이라 한다). 원고는 현재 ㉮㉯건물에서 ‘F’을 경영하고 있는 자이다.

C. The Defendant issued the first corrective order to voluntarily remove the Plaintiff by July 27, 2011, and the Plaintiff did not correct it within the said period, and issued the second corrective order again on July 28, 201, to order the voluntary removal by no later than July 27, 201, on the ground that approximately 100 square meters of the board body structure, and approximately 30 square meters of the board board roof structure, among the building at a place and the (B) building, were extended without permission.

The defendant did not correct the plaintiff within the second period, and on August 29, 201, the plaintiff violated the Building Act.