logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.25 2017가단100649
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is Plaintiff A, C is the husband and wife, Plaintiff D and E are the children of the above couple, Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is a juristic person operating the Ansan Industrial Hospital affiliated to the Korea University University (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On September 26, 2014, at around 15:30 on September 26, 2014, Plaintiff A, via the National Assembly members of the F.I.D., left home after undergoing the first and the first operation of Plaintiff A’s first operation. At around 16:41 on September 26, 2014, Plaintiff A received self-official image (hereinafter “MI,”) from the G Hospital on an emergency room at the Defendant Hospital, complained of the pain caused by plouting out the left knee-ray inspection, etc., and was conducted by X-Eray inspection, etc., after receiving treatment of the left knee-hand knee Slin (Lt.K.) from the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, and then returned to Plaintiff A, on September 27, 2014, after undergoing an inspection of the self-official image (hereinafter “MI”) at the G Hospital’s hospital on the outside 1st of the Defendant Hospital on the left-hand of the same 2nd.

3. Since then, the plaintiff A complained of the left-hand knee perne perne in around February 28, 2015, after receiving the pain treatment at the defendant hospital, and the medical professionals of the defendant hospital have the same year.

3.3. After conducting the RoI test with respect to the above plaintiff, the plaintiff diagnosed the left-hand knee-prone Mascus Retear, Ne Lt.

C. On April 7, 2015, Plaintiff A re-hospitalized the Defendant Hospital on April 7, 2015, and the same month.

8. The Defendant hospital’s medical professionals conducted knee-Feeng-Feeng-Feeeng-Feeng-Feeng-Feeng-Fekneng transplant (hereinafter “the second surgery”) and discharged it on

2. The medical staff of the Defendant Hospital are Plaintiff .

arrow