1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

o From February 7, 2011 to 18, the part 5 pages 15 to 18, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “batch fat and tensions” by asserting “fat fat fat fat fat, 15 days prior to fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat and gat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat)

② On February 9, 2011, the Plaintiff complained of Mae-Mae-Mane-Mane-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mac] on March 2, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed both of the LBP (O) and kne-Mac-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Mack-Macknk-knkn.

③ On February 28, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as part part of the drilling wall, “part part of the drilling wall,” and part of the human part damage of the other side side part of “part part, part,” etc. in the F image diagnosis radiation.

④ On March 22, 2011, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from the Hansung-gu Hospital annexed to the Hansung-gu, as “inhuman resource from the outside side”.

o. The result of the first instance court’s request for the examination of medical records with respect to the Aju University, where the injury or disease occurred on January 28, 2011, part 1 of the 7th to the 9th 8th 6th th th 6th 6th .