1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 2, 2009, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service on December 31, 2014, when the Plaintiff returned to the Army as sick, and was discharged from active service on December 31, 2014.

On January 2, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of persons of distinguished service to the State with the Defendant, claiming that “knenee is injured by plucking, plucking, plucking, etc., which is a part of the evaluation of major tactical training on July 2, 2012,” applying for the registration of persons of distinguished service to the State.

B. On January 29, 2016, the Defendant rendered a judgment on the Plaintiff as a person eligible for veteran’s compensation only on the basis of “mane-defeng-defeng-defeng-defe-de-de-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-de-fe-de-de-de-fe-de-de-de

In response to this, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation following the administrative appeal (Dismissal), and the decision that revoked the non-applicable decision of the person eligible for veteran's compensation with respect to the "defee-defee-defe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-de-fe-fe-de

On January 19, 2018, the Defendant: “The instant difference” (hereinafter collectively referred to as “this case’s difference”) between the Defendant and the Defendant’s “Fekne-free kne-free kne-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-out

(C) On March 30, 2018, the Defendant determined that the instant disability falls short of the grading criteria and notified the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”) upon deliberation and resolution by the new physical examination and the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement.

【Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The legality of the instant disposition

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is limited to both knee and knee, or the Plaintiff’s knee and knee are disabled in light of its function.