logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.04.25 2017고단2195
영유아보육법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 2013, the Defendant is working as the president of D in the Yasan-gu, Yasan-si, B, and is working as the president of F in the Yasan-gu E on January 2014, 2014.

The Defendant, as an operator of a child care center, was not granted the State subsidy under the basic childcare fee for young children aged between 0-2 and 0,000 by fraud or other improper means. On July 2014, the Defendant received 17,868,710 won in total as the basic childcare fee by entering the childcare integration system into the childcare integration system as if he/she were financial resources for the same child care center, and received 361,000 won as the basic childcare fee from the Yansan-gu Office in total 22 times, such as the list (1), and (2) of the list of crimes in attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against H, I, and J;

1. Two-time protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police in K or L, respectively;

1. Three-time protocols concerning the interrogation of the police officers against M;

1. Details of payment of each subsidy, details of appointment and dismissal of each infant care staff, details of payment of each basic infant care fees, details of accounts of each infant care staff member, details of payment of each special allowance, details of payment of each special allowance, and application of statutes governing

1. Relevant legal provisions and Article 54 (2) 1 of the Infant Care Act, the selection of punishment for each infant who is subject to the punishment, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is necessary to strictly punish an act of receiving subsidies by falsely claiming subsidies for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution in the sense that it is a crime that defrauds the National Treasury, and the Defendant has attempted to destroy evidence by continuously soliciting the infant care teachers registered with falsity in the course of investigation to actively make false statements.

However, the defendant reflects his wrongness in depth.

arrow