logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2021.01.06 2020고단5369
영유아보육법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall receive a subsidy or use a subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

On March 2019, the Defendant applied for the grant of the “C Child Care Center” and the “C Child Care Support Fund for Teachers’ Holding Concurrent Office” and the “Support Fund for Teachers’ Holding Concurrent Office” to the effect that “five of the proportion of teachers’ children is 1:5,000,000 young children who were 1:5,000,000 young children who were 1:5,000 young children, and the Defendant, who is the president, was taking care of the teachers, was able to provide them with the same.”

However, in fact, for eight children belonging to the above D, E was in charge of childcare, and the defendant was a teacher in charge of the above D, and the defendant did not meet eight hours of childcare for at least 15 days a day as a teacher in charge, so he/she was not entitled to receive the above subsidies.

Ultimately, the Defendant received subsidies of KRW 12,151,460 (basic childcare fees of KRW 11,626,460) in total seven times from around that time to February 2020, including subsidies of KRW 12,151,460 (basic childcare fees of KRW 525,00), as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Table, from around that time, the Defendant received subsidies of KRW 1,883,80 and KRW 75,00 for the president’s concurrent office holding office as a teacher from the Namyang-ju viewing.

Accordingly, the Defendant received subsidies through false application.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each police statement statement in F and G (Evidence No. 26 through 41 page of the evidence record), each accusation letter, each duplicate of each appearance book, each book, a copy of Kakakao Stockholm Stockholm Stockholm, a list of children in charge of the suspect, a work manual, an investigation report on the payment of subsidies (H statements in infant care teachers), and an investigation report (E statements of infant care teachers);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Article 54 (2) 1 of the Infant Care Act (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Enforcement Decree of the Infant Care Act for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is as follows.

arrow