logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.06.15 2017고정458
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a Bchip driver of the passenger car.

On January 11, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 19:00, and proceeded at the speed of speed from the bus stops No. 44 to the above elementary school at the end of the bus stops.

The location was long off, and the other vehicles are parked at the edge of the lane, so the defendant has a duty of care to reduce speed and accurately manipulate the steering system, brakes, etc. of the vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance by checking well the right and the right of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and was parked on the right side of the progress direction by negligence.

C The D-owned D-W L-W L-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

When the Defendant 1,364,252, F-wing vehicle repair cost, 5,167,864, and H-wing vehicle repair cost, 562,659, and J-Pacific vehicle repair cost, 3,600,000 won and 3,60,000 won are destroyed, the Defendant 1 left the vehicle immediately and escaped without taking any necessary measures despite having to take all necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. Accident scene and vehicle photograph;

1. Application of written estimates for repair costs to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Even if the grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are considered as they are, the developments of the instant case alleged by the Defendant are considered.

arrow