logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.05.17 2017고단117
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in C in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the upper limit), the violation of the Road Traffic Act (the measures not taken after the accident), the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving), and the violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On October 14, 2016, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, entered the front road of “E” located in D at the time of Jinju by driving the said car at around 11:27 on October 14, 2016, from the alley of Conwon Elementary School at the time of Jinju.

The place is a road installed on the front line, where the passage of the vehicle is frequent, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to avoid crossing the vehicle by breaking the center line to the person engaged in driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went through the central line at the university room of the Ethmp vehicle, which was driven by the victim F (hereinafter 45 years old)'s G Ethp vehicle's left door of the G Ethp vehicle's driving at the university room of the Ethp vehicle due to the negligence of crossinging the central line, and led the victim H to the left part of the G Ethp vehicle's G Ethp vehicle's driving at the center line, and the victim H, who was parked on the opposite line with the upper part of the Eth Eth Motor vehicle's front and rear the back part of the Eth Ethp vehicle's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim F, such as catum salt, etc. requiring a treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim F by immediately stopping the said passenger car, even though the Defendant destroyed the said passenger car to be repaired in an amount equivalent to KRW 910,828, and KRW 715,168, respectively.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a person who was a holder of a C heading car.

The defendant did not subscribe to mandatory insurance at the above date, time, and place, as above.

arrow