beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 5, 2015, around 21:45, the Defendant, while under the influence of 0.161% of alcohol concentration in blood transfusion without a vehicle’s license, was driving a optolog car from the direction of the coefficient shooting distance on the side of the reservoir of Yancheon-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu.
At night, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by accurately manipulating the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty and duty
Nevertheless, the Defendant had been negligent in driving while driving the MF3 car due to the preceding traffic accident, but was immediately driven by the victim MF3 car due to the previous traffic accident, but the Defendant’s remaining part of the right-hand part of the MF3 car is left-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the driver’s vehicle. The Defendant continued to drive the MF3 car due to the victim H driver who stopped in front of the vehicle, and then the MF3 car was driven by the victim H driver who stopped in front of the vehicle, and again, the SS3 car was driven by the victim J driver who stopped in front of the vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant driven the Defendant’s car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the Defendant’s H, such as light fat, which requires two weeks’ medical treatment, and brain fat, etc. requiring two weeks’ medical treatment. By occupational negligence, the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s back fater, etc. so that the Defendant’s repair cost of the Defendant’s SM3 car owned by the Victim F would amount to KRW 2,129,731,00,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant in the first trial record;