beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[2013Kadan351] The Defendant entered into a contract with a branch office of the National Bank and entered into a household check from August 13, 2002, and traded checks.
On July 12, 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number J, face value 3,00,000, and one copy of the bank check in the name of the Defendant as of May 31, 2012.
Since then, on October 20, 2012, the holder of the check presented the check on October 20, 2012, which was within the time limit for presentment of payment, but the Defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.
The Defendant, including that, from around that time to July 12, 2012, issued, but did not pay, as indicated in Nos. 2, 4, and 9 of the annexed Table Nos. 2, 4, and 9, a sum of seven times in total, KRW 21 million.
[2013 Highest 457]
1. On July 12, 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the check number K, face value 3,00,000, and one copy of the bank check in the Defendant’s name as of January 7, 2013 at the above “I” office.
Since then, the holder of the check presented the check on January 7, 2013, which is within the present presentation period, but the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.
2. The Defendant issued a check number L, face value KRW 3,00,000, and one copy of the bank check in the name of the Defendant as of December 29, 2012, at the date and place indicated in paragraph 1.
Since then, the holder of the check presented the check on December 29, 2012, which is within the present presentation period, but the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.
[2013 Highest 769] On July 12, 2012, the Defendant issued one check number M, face value of 3,000,000, and one copy of the bank bank check in the name of the Defendant, which became the date of issuance on January 26, 2013.
Since then, the holder of the check presented the check on January 28, 2013, which is within the present time limit, but the defendant did not receive the suspension of transaction.