logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.09.25 2013고단5940
부정수표단속법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From February 13, 2013, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Defendant in the name of a new bank Bobadong branch from February 21, 2013, and from June 21, 2013, the Defendant has traded the check number.

[2013 Highest 5940] On June 2013, the Defendant issued a check number D, check amount “D”, “20,000,000,000”, and issuance date “ August 28, 2013,” one copy of the number of shares of a new bank under the name of the Defendant, which is the Defendant’s residence of Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C Apartment A 501, Dong 501.

Around August 29, 2013, the period for presentment for payment, the holder of the check presented the check to the above bank, but the Defendant did not pay it as non-transaction, and at that time, as shown in the No. 1 through No. 7 of the List of Crimes No. 7 issued by the Defendant, each holder presented to the payment bank within the period for presentation, but did not pay it as shortage of deposits, etc.

[2013 Highest 6856] around May 2013, the Defendant issued one check number G, face value G, 15,000,000 won in the office of “F” of the third floor of the building in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, and the date of issuance on September 5, 2013, and issued one check by the bank under the above Defendant’s name, which was issued on September 5, 2013, and the payment proposal was made by the holder on September 5, 2013, but was not paid due to the shortage of deposit.

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to June 2013, issued two copies of the check in the same manner as attached Table 2 Nos. 1 and 2 at the above office via the same two occasions, and presented a payment proposal within the period of payment proposal, but each holder did not receive payment due to the suspension of transaction.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant issued a check, the Defendant did not pay it as a suspension of transaction.

[2013dan7482] The Defendant’s office at the third floor “F” office of the building in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon around June 2013, the check number H, face value of 20,000,000.

arrow