Cases
2010 fails to commit frauds 1685
Defendant
1. Fixed 00 (54**********) and food agencies.
Daegu-gu 00 Dong 000
【Special Metropolitan City, Gyeongbuk-gun 00, 00
2. this00 (62**2**2***) and insurance solicitors.
Daegu-dong-gu 00 OFG 00 Dong 000
Gyeongsan-si 00 00 000
Prosecutor
Kim Tae-ray
Defense Counsel
Attorney Park Jong-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant
Imposition of Judgment
July 13, 2010
Text
Defendant 50 is punished by a fine of KRW 4,00,000 and KRW 2,500,000, respectively. In the event that the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, the Defendants each of the above fines shall be confined to the Labor House for the period calculated by converting the amount of KRW 50,000 into one day.
An order to pay an amount equivalent to each of the above fines shall be issued.
Reasons
Criminal facts
피고인 정00은 대구 남구 00동 000 주식회사 00 식품 대리점을 운영하는 사람이고 피고인 이00는 피고인 정00의 처제로서 피고인들은 공모하여, 피해자 구이0이 피고인 정00에 대한 7천만원 보증채무금 판결문에 의거 피고인 정00의 식품대리점에 보관 중인 검은콩 베지밀 등 유체동산을 압류함으로써 개시된 경매 절차에서 2009. 12.10. 피고인 정00의 아들인 정QQ가 10,711,000원에 위 유체동산을 낙찰받 자. 피고인 이00 가 피고인 정00에게 20,000,000원을 차용해 주고 엘리트두유 베지 밀 등 21개 품목 1,860박스를 담보물로 제공받은 것처럼 작성한 허위의 양도담보부 채 무변제계약 공정증서를 그 무렵 대구지방법원 경매 담당 직원에게 배당금 신청을 하며 제출하여 이에 속은 위 법원으로부터 6,502,616원을 배당받아 같은 금액 상당의 재산상 이익을 취득하려 하였으나 피해자가 배당 이의신청을 하여 배당금을 수령하지 못하여 미수에 그쳤다.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement of the police statement concerning the Gu00;
1. Investigation report (verification related to the execution of a counter auction by the complainant, submission of data by the complainant, reference materials for the handling of each case; 1. Notice of request for the attachment of corporeal movables, notification of the date of auction of movables, notification of the distribution schedule, copy of a notarial deed, copy of the judgment, request for cooperation in investigation, request for request for cooperation in investigation, copy of bankbooks
1. Relevant provisions concerning criminal facts;
Articles 352, 347(1), and 30 of the Criminal Code
1. Detention in a workhouse;
Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act
1. Order of provisional payment;
It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Judges
Judges Term Exchange