logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2007.7.4.선고 2006가소73161 판결
임금
Cases

206 Wages 73161

Plaintiff

1. Demotion00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

2. Title 00;

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

3. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

4. Kim 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

5. Kim 00

Kimhae-si 00 00 Li 00 apartment

6. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

7. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

8. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

9. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

10. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

November 11, 190

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

12. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

13. Kim 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

14. Kim 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

15. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

16. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

17. Kim 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

18. Kim 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

19. Kim 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

20. Gambling0

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

21. Stambling0

Msan City 00 Eup 00 Ri

22. Stambling0

Changwon-si 00 Dong

23. Stambling0

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

24. Park 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

25. Park 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong

26. Anti-00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00

27. Sexual 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

28. Losses and 00

Changwon-si O-dong O Qa apartment

29. grandchildren 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

30. 00

Msan City 00 Dong

31. Dried 00

M. M. M. M. M. 00 00

32. Newly Inserted by Act No. 500

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

33. Analb0

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

34. Anchopath 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

35. Paint 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

36.Fish 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

37.Oil 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

38. Sheet00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

39. Sheet00

Changwon-si 00 Eup 00 Ri

40. Prostitution 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

41.00

Jinhae-si 00 dong

42.00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

43.00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

44.00

Kimhae-si 00, 00 Ri

45.00

Changwon-si 00 00

46.00

Changwon-si OOdong OB OBD

47.00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

48.00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

49.00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

50. Optional00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

51. Sheet00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

52.former 00

Kimhae-si 00,00 apartment

53.Ba 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

54.Dried 00

Busan 00 Gu 00 Dong

55. Fixed 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

56. Fixed 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

57.Dried 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong

58. Initial00

Changwon-si 00 Dong

59. Lighting00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

60. Lighting00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

61. Liquor 00

Changwon-si 00 00 apartment

62. Car 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

63. Difference 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

64.00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

65. Maximum 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

66. Lower 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong

67. Yellow 00

Changwon-si OO-dong 00 apartment

68. Yellow 00

Changwon-si 00 Dong 00 apartment

[Defendant-Appellee] Defendant 1 et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant-appellee

[Judgment of the court below]

Defendant

0. Heavy Industries Ltd.

Changwon-si 00 Dong

Representative Director Park 00

Attorney Kim Kim-gn, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 30, 2007

Imposition of Judgment

July 4, 2007

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The defendant of the Gu office shall pay 5% interest per annum to the plaintiffs and 20% interest per annum from the day following the service of a copy of the complaint of this case to the day of the order of the judgment of this case, and 5% interest per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

Reasons

1. In light of the fact that Article 56 subparagraph 3 of the collective agreement (Article 56 subparagraph 4) of the Criminal Procedure Act applies only to cases where a suspect in a complaint case is sent to an investigative agency, or where a defendant is present to a court, or where a witness, witness, defendant, plaintiff, etc. of the court head or public institution related to public service falls under "when leaving the court as a witness, witness, or plaintiff, etc.," Article 56 subparagraph 3 of the collective agreement of the defendant (Article 56 of the collective agreement) and Article 56 of the collective agreement is "public official", Article 56 of the collective agreement is provided, where it is impossible to provide labor without any reason (Article 56 subparagraph 4), or where it is related to the business of the public official (Article 56 subparagraph 5) or the company (Article 56 subparagraph 3 of the collective agreement is applicable only to cases where a suspect is present to an investigative agency or the defendant is present to a court, unlike the case where a witness, witness, etc. is present to prevent his disadvantage immediately to the public official.

2. The plaintiff asserted that the defendant was a suspect before August 2006, who was sent to an investigative agency as the defendant, or that all cases that the defendant was sent to the court as the defendant as a public official (the above case should be interpreted as falling under Article 56 subparagraph 3 of the collective agreement, or that the defendant interpreted the above case as falling under Article 56 subparagraph 3 of the collective agreement, or that the above case was interpreted as falling under Article 56 subparagraph 3 of the collective agreement) but it is insufficient to view that the witness yellow 00 witness testimony alone recognized all the above cases as a public official before August 2006, and there is no evidence to support that the above case was interpreted as falling under subparagraph 3 of Article 56 of the collective agreement.

Judges

Judges Cho Yong-chul

arrow