logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.09.06 2017고정131
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since September 2015, 2015, the Seoul Do Do Do Do Do Madra, the Seoul Do Do Do Maddong Association received subsidies from the Gun Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do 100 million from the provision of subsidies to improve the landscape by installing art works, such as character, on the front of the commercial building, and the victim E is a person who actually promoted the said "D development project" as the vice-chairperson of the C Do Do Do Do Do Maddong, and the defendant is a person who produced a planning document from the C

The Defendant, in conflict with the victim in relation to the implementation of the aforementioned “D development project”, had expressed a view to spreading false information about the victim’s reputation by spreading false information to a group or reading room where the people who supplied works to the “D development project” gather.

On May 23, 2016, the Defendant connected smartphone app “Kakao Stockholm” to a group or reading room in which the victim E, G, H, etc. participate, and posted the victim’s photograph on May 23, 2016, at around 15:00, the Defendant was in the position where the four merchants had stolen the day at the center and proceeded with it.

“The message sent” was sent.

However, the fact was that the Defendant was not the project undertaker of the “D development project” as above, and only one million won of service charges from the C Commercial Association and prepared a planning document related to the “D development project”. The victim did not have any right of the Defendant related to the “D development project.”

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the victim, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. The application of the law to the screen by cutting down a Kakao chympis room.

arrow