The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, from October 2015 to July 2016, 2016, was working as a head from “B Association” to “B Association” and was flicking a writing against the victim C’s association’s operation complaint, which is the president of the Association, and Kakao’s conference room used by members of the Association.

On July 15, 2016, 20:29, the Defendant participated in “B” group C Kakaoo Stockholm room in Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu as a Kakao Stockholm room, and participated in “E.” The president of the Association who was the president of the Association is flick next to the female.

F. G. H. 이쁜 애들 등등 ”에 대한 글을 올리고, 2016. 7. 16. 19:16 경 같은 카카오 톡 대화방에 “ 카드가 안될 정도로 과거 쫄딱 망해서 작년에는 협회장님 옷두 한 벌이였어요.

요즈음 삥 뜯어서 옷두 사고 월세 내고 뉴 스킨 제품. 먹고 바르는 것두 60만 원에서 70만 원 정도 먹구 바른다고 하더군요

The phrase “ .............” was written respectively.

However, in fact, the president of the Association did not allow the victim to sit F, G, and H on his side because he is good for women, and did not use the f, G, and H by force from members for the purpose of paying clothes of high value, cosmetics, or other monthly wages.

Nevertheless, for the purpose of slandering, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts on the information and communications network.

2. The instant case is a crime falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 70(3) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.