logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2017.06.29 2016고정130
퇴거불응등
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant B, C, and D of each fine of 700,000,000 won, Defendant E, and F of each fine of 50,00 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The Chief of the I Site of the National Metal Trade Union, Defendant B is the Chief of the National Metal Trade Union I, Defendant D is the Chief of the I Site of the National Metal Trade Union, Defendant C is the Chief of the I Site of the National Metal Trade Union, Defendant C is the Chief of the I Organization of the National Metal Trade Union, Defendant E, and Defendant F is the company members who work in K in the J of the Republic of Korea.

1. Defendant A’s refusal to leave on March 4, 2016: (a) around 16:50 on March 4, 2016, the Defendant: (b) installed spackers and microphones at the K-factory parking lot located in Seosan-siJ on March 4, 2016; and (c) held a campaign speech to the effect that the labor union members return to the union and the labor union members made a campaign speech to the effect that the demand for collective bargaining is silent and pressured; (d) around 17:16 on the same day, the Defendant was demanded from the victim K L directors to request the employees to leave the place of business as they would be likely to engage in a disturbance while on duty.

However, by not later than 17:53 of the same day, the Defendant did not comply with the request for the withdrawal of the victim without justifiable reasons, with the union members, at the K Factory parking lot within the same day.

2. The Defendant refused to leave Defendant B, on March 5, 2016, demanded that the Defendant return to the place of business of the above K and take all outside services that he/she works in the Republic of Korea from the place of business of the said K, and that the Defendant would take away from the place of business of the said K, and received a demand from the K representative director and the head of the M division to take a bath for the victim M to leave the outside from the place of business of the victim M.

However, the Defendant did not comply with this and did not comply with the demand for the withdrawal of the victim from 14:00 on the same day without justifiable grounds.

3. On March 5, 2016, Defendant A’s refusal to leave on March 5, 2016, the Defendant demanded on March 5, 2016, Defendant A to take out all the external services that he/she was going to go outside the place of business after going to go beyond the steel refining and working in the said K regularly, and was demanded by the victim KM division to request the outside person to leave the place of business.

However, the defendant does not respond to it and does not respond to it until 14:00 on the same day.

arrow