logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.05.24 2017고단137
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for fraud at the Changwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 28, 2015.

Around January 16, 2013, the Defendant stated that “Around January 16, 2017, the Defendant provided home fluorcing with Changwon-si, Changwon-si, which was 56, and was aware of support education, the Defendant provided a false statement to the Victim C, “I will use money for the repayment of obligations if I lend money, and will repay money within a prompt time.”

However, in fact, at the time, the Defendant had a debt amounting to KRW 12 million, and the bond amounting to KRW 20 million, and the economic situation was not good enough to delay the Defendant’s mobile phone charges and hospital charges, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, it was difficult to fully repay the existing debt. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money borrowed from the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 37,006,927 from January 16, 2013 to May 14, 2015, as indicated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet from the victim.

"2017 Highest 212"

1. On March 2014, the criminal defendant against the victim D is currently proceeding with the victim D in a mutually influorial restaurant located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, Masan-si.

The loan of KRW 8 million in the short of down payment, which is called "a false statement to return after commencing the operation of the first place."

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant was liable for the total amount of KRW 53 million, including approximately KRW 20 million, KRW 20 million, KRW 20 million, KRW 13 million, and KRW 13 million, and the Defendant did not pay the principal and interest that should be paid every month due to the absence of certain income or special property.

arrow