1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as follows: Defendant C’s name was added to the statement in the evidence Nos. 5 through 8, which is insufficient to reverse the judgment that it was the actual subcontractor who received the subcontract for the instant construction project by lending the Plaintiff Ebren’s name; and Plaintiff Ebrate paid KRW 42 million on April 18, 2014 to Lbren’s public health business; thus, it is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the result of the order to submit financial information to the Federation of Korea Community Credit Cooperatives under the evidence that falls short of Ebren’s repayment of the instant promissory money, and thus, this is acceptable pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.