1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for this case by the court of first instance is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for this case is identical to that of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows.

The maximum working age “60” in the judgment of the court of first instance as “65” and “2010-9-26” as “2015-9-26,” respectively (see each of the above parts appears to be erroneous). As to the part in which the Plaintiffs asserted that the amount of lost income should be calculated on the basis of income as a pastor or teacher, the witness K’s testimony should be added with insufficient evidence, and even if all of the evidence are reviewed together, the judgment of the court of first instance is just.

The defendants asserted that the court of first instance recognized the plaintiffs' labor disability for 4 years with the plaintiffs' labor disability loss rate of 24%. However, the court of first instance's request for the evaluation of medical records alone is insufficient to reverse the above recognition, and there is no other evidence, so the judgment on this part of the court of first instance is just.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.