logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.04.11 2018고단533
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 5, 2017, the Defendant, at around 3-5, arranged for a sexual intercourse with the above women by receiving 3-5 unspecified male customers a promise to engage in sexual traffic from around October 10, 2017 and receiving 80,000 won to pay 4-50,000 won for each time, out of 4-50,00 won or more of them in return for a promise to engage in sexual traffic from the unspecified male customers to October 10, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against E or D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation report (calculated of profits from the sex trafficking of Defendant);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The act of arranging sexual traffic for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is highly detrimental to society by commercializing sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, etc. In addition, on July 14, 2017, the Defendant who committed repeated crimes was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence in a prison on October 2, 2017.

In light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed during the period, although the liability is not easy, the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake, has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the period and profits of the crime, and the age, sex, environment, etc. of the defendant.

arrow